Skip to content

OCPBUGS-76403, CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP#2974

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.15from
igsilya:ovn-unpin-4.15
Apr 8, 2026
Merged

OCPBUGS-76403, CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP#2974
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.15from
igsilya:ovn-unpin-4.15

Conversation

@igsilya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@igsilya igsilya commented Feb 9, 2026

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.16: #2972

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 9, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 9, 2026

@igsilya: This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.16: #2972

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 9, 2026

/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-76277

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 9, 2026

@igsilya: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76403. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle OCPBUGS-76403: CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP

Details

In response to this:

/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-76277

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP OCPBUGS-76403: CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP Feb 9, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 9, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76403, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.16: #2972

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 9, 2026

/retitle OCPBUGS-76403, CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP

@igsilya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 9, 2026

/retitle OCPBUGS-76403, CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title OCPBUGS-76403: CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP OCPBUGS-76403, CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP Feb 9, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 9, 2026

@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76403, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.16: #2972

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 9, 2026

/retest-required

@igsilya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 10, 2026

All passed on re-run. The gofmt/lint/unit jobs seem borked, and will need an override, AFAIU.

@igsilya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 11, 2026

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 11, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 11, 2026

@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76403, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277 targets the "4.16.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.16.0, 4.16.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@tssurya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tssurya commented Mar 6, 2026

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@igsilya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Mar 19, 2026

/retest-required

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins.
This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and
especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging
this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug
fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can
take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it
automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it.  There is
a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that
ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released
through FDP.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
Comment thread Dockerfile.base Outdated
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 20, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)
  • do-not-merge/work-in-progress

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 81a4efa5-ed00-459a-8986-0b340ad5ab12

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@jcaamano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Mar 20, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 20, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 20, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: igsilya, jcaamano

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 20, 2026

@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76403, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277 targets the "4.16.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.16.0, 4.16.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.16: #2972

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Mar 20, 2026

/retest-required

@asood-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/verified by CI

e2e-aws-ovn-fdp-qe job passed

Ginkgo tests

/logs/artifacts/junit:
total 32
-rw-r--r--. 1 1012240000 1012240000 30838 Mar 20 13:25 import-SDN.xml
openshift-extended-test:
  total: 43
  failures: 0
  errors: 0
  skipped: 5

Cucushift tests

/logs/artifacts/serial/junit-report:
total 0
Done. 4 files processed.
cucushift-e2e:
  total: 25
  failures: 0
  errors: 0
  skipped: 2

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Mar 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@asood-rh: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by CI

e2e-aws-ovn-fdp-qe job passed

Ginkgo tests

/logs/artifacts/junit:
total 32
-rw-r--r--. 1 1012240000 1012240000 30838 Mar 20 13:25 import-SDN.xml
openshift-extended-test:
 total: 43
 failures: 0
 errors: 0
 skipped: 5

Cucushift tests

/logs/artifacts/serial/junit-report:
total 0
Done. 4 files processed.
cucushift-e2e:
 total: 25
 failures: 0
 errors: 0
 skipped: 2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Mar 23, 2026

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@igsilya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Mar 23, 2026

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 8fbb563 and 2 for PR HEAD 062a155 in total

@pliurh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

pliurh commented Mar 31, 2026

/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 31, 2026

@igsilya: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security 062a155 link false /test security

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@igsilya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Apr 1, 2026

I see the exact same test failure on the current release-4.15 branch, so it is not related to this PR. See the example here: #3105 (https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/openshift_ovn-kubernetes/3105/pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.15-4.15-upgrade-from-stable-4.14-local-gateway-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/2039306699600302080)

@pliurh @jcaamano can we just override the job for now?

@pliurh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

pliurh commented Apr 2, 2026

/override ci/prow/4.15-upgrade-from-stable-4.14-local-gateway-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 2, 2026

@pliurh: pliurh unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators, approvers in top level OWNERS file, and the following github teams:openshift: openshift-release-oversight openshift-staff-engineers openshift-sustaining-engineers.

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/4.15-upgrade-from-stable-4.14-local-gateway-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Apr 8, 2026

/test 4.15-upgrade-from-stable-4.14-local-gateway-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 001b26d into openshift:release-4.15 Apr 8, 2026
26 of 27 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@igsilya: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76403
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76403 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.16: #2972

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix included in release 4.15.0-0.nightly-2026-04-10-030227

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.